The only way this would be a violation is if they refused to release the GPL code for their GCC port or Linux source to their paying customer. Thats it. Make a request, they'll honor it. It's their business model. Linking against FlexLM doesn't require them to publish FlexLM code either, just the code in GCC that links to it.

My observation of this business practice is that when you sell GPL software to uneducated users, you can get away with as much as your customer will let you. There's nothing wrong with that. If someone wants to play on 'easy-mode' using DevRocket, they pay more than someone who plays 'Advanced Mode' with the CodeSourcery-lite. You substitute money for time investment and vise versa.

It's unfair to accuse MV as GPL violators simply because they don't fit the GPL model that you're familiar with.

For the record, I'm not affiliated with Montavista or a customer of theirs. OpenEmbedded here. But I do respect their effort to make money while adhering to the GPL model. Nothing in the GPL says that you must take a vow of poverty to participate.

-n

On Aug 6, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Vladimir Pantelic wrote:

Griffis, Brad wrote:


Thank you for your reply. Good question. Yes, it's a gcc compiler so it definitely would/should be possible to remove the licensing. It uses FLEXnet licensing so it's probably tougher than some simple time-bomb somewhere.

My hope was to avoid cat and mouse games with Montavista. For example, there is a "demo version" of the compiler (without the FLEXnet licensing) that all customers can get for free. I wasn't sure if any improvements were in the real compiler though. Other thoughts I had were potentially dropping use of the Montavista toolchain altogether and
using CodeSourcery instead.  Would that create other problems?


there is no cat and mouse game to be played, MV has to release source under the GPL and I doubt they would like to have the flexlm part there visible for all to see, so they better release one without...

This is GPL violation, so simple!

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to