If you actually want FlexSDK source, request a developer package from
Accresso. FlexLM source is a little harder to come by.
If you're just trying to prove a point, read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception
Either way, brow-beating people with the GPL isn't the way to win them
over.
-n
On Aug 6, 2009, at 4:06 PM, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 06 August 2009, Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00041.html
Those messages don't touch on the FlexLM issue.
Distributing just GCC (+patches) isn't enough.
Because its seems the GPL'd core is combined with
FlexLM, source to both must be available to anyone
who gets that combined product.
If FlexLM is actually secure, exposing its source
won't reduce "security"...
TI may have duties here too, since they distribute
some MV tools with e.g. EVM boards.
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
