Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com> writes: > Miguel Aguilar <miguel.agui...@ridgerun.com> writes: > >> [MA] I already took a look into DM646x USB patch thread and the >> discussion about the board specific issue, but Is there any agreement >> about the way to handle do this? Like use a usb_vbus_control in the >> board file. >> >> There are still many board specific stuff inside USB DaVinci driver so >> that would be better if we will be able to follow a clear way to do >> this, and define what belongs to driver, SoC and board domains, so Is >> there any current work in this way to move the board specific stuff >> from driver to board file in a standard way? > > > I was hoping for a proposal (ideally in the form of a patch) from > Swami after the review of his earlier patch. > > Since nothing has been forthcoming from from him, any others are > welcome.
Ooops, responded to this before I saw Swami is working on this. Please feel free to send any ideas/suggestions/prefernces to Swami, and Cc list. Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
