Sure. I will send v4 by Friday. Thanks. - Hemant
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 8:39 PM > To: Pedanekar, Hemant > Cc: [email protected]; David Brownell > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] davinci: dm646x-evm: Add platform data for NAND > > David Brownell <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wednesday 02 September 2009, Siddharth Choudhuri wrote: > >> I would suggest splitting the "bootloader" partition into two -- (i) > ubl > >> and (ii) uboot. UBL can be 5 blocks (1 + 4 spare blocks) and u-boot > >> could be the rest of the blocks. One of the advantages of this approach > >> is that u-boot can be upgraded/reflashed easily from within Linux > using > >> flash_eraseall and nandwrite. (Although, even with the current > partition > >> scheme, u-boot can be written, but requires erasing individual blocks > >> and could be error prone). > > > > Heh. My suggestion is to go the other way: just a single > > "bootloader" partition of eight blocks or so. Don't expose > > any of the substructure at all. > > I agree with Dave here. > > Hemant, can you respin with a single bootloader partition? > > Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
