On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 02:18:42PM +0530, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 00:19:05, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > "Mark A. Greer" <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 06:10:41PM +0530, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > > >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:40:04, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > >> Are you trying to align with the OOB layout being followed in U-Boot? > > > > > > Yes. That and to match what both TI and MV have been supporting for > > > quite a while. > > > > > >> U-Boot for da830/omap-l137 is not in mainline yet. I am planning to > > >> start working on that shortly. We can re-visit this when da830/omap-l137 > > >> support is present in u-boot. > > > > > > Hmm, okay... > > > > > > So what about all the platforms that are already out there? > > > > > > Even if it changes, I'd recommend the driver patch [1/2] still go > > > in so that the functionality is there if/when its ever needed (and > > > its a really simple patch). I can alway redo the platform patch [2/2]. > > > > I'll apply 1/1 today. > > > > Sudhakar, for 2/2, what's the reason to wait for u-boot support to go > > upstream. Is the u-boot support going to change? If most folks are using > > recent u-boot anyways, it seems that this should get merged as well. > > > > Kevin, > > Existing u-boot for da8xx was based on u-boot for DM355/DM365 but u-boot > for DM355/DM365 has changed in mainline so I expect that u-boot for da8xx > is also going to change. Also, there may be some users which are using the > old u-boot for DM355/DM365 and this kind of patch is required for those > platforms as well. Of course it can be a different patch. What if we applied the patch so systems with the current u-boot work and then worry about how to disable it when the new u-boot is ready (e.g., CONFIG_ option or ...). Mark -- _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
