"Karicheri, Muralidharan" <[email protected]> writes:
>>> CLK(NULL, "rto", &rto_clk),
>>> CLK(NULL, "usb", &usb_clk),
>>> + CLK("dm355_ccdc", "master", &vpss_master_clk),
>>> + CLK("dm355_ccdc", "slave", &vpss_slave_clk),
>>
>>I still don't understand why you have to add new entries here and
>>can't simply rename the existing CLK nodes using vpss_*_clk.
>>
>
> [MK] This will allow multiple drivers define their own clocks derived from
> these. ccdc driver is not the only driver using these clocks.
OK, but that still doesn't answer why you need multiple CLK() nodes.
Who else is using the clocks?
> Your earlier suggestion was to use as follows :-
>
> - CLK(NULL, "vpss_master", &vpss_master_clk),
> - CLK(NULL, "vpss_slave", &vpss_slave_clk),
> + CLK("vpfe-capture", "master", &vpss_master_clk),
> + CLK("vpfe-capture", "slave", &vpss_slave_clk),
>
> I am not sure if the following will work so that it can be used across
> multiple drivers.
>
> + CLK(NULL, "master", &vpss_master_clk),
> + CLK(NULL, "slave", &vpss_slave_clk),
>
> If yes, I can re-do this patch. Please confirm.
No, this will not work. You need a dev_id field so that matching
is done using the struct device.
My original suggestion was when you had the VPFE driver doing the
clk_get(). Now that it's in CCDC, maybe it should look like this.
- CLK(NULL, "vpss_master", &vpss_master_clk),
- CLK(NULL, "vpss_slave", &vpss_slave_clk),
+ CLK("ccdc", "master", &vpss_master_clk),
+ CLK("ccdc", "slave", &vpss_slave_clk),
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
