On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 19:14:45, Alan Cox wrote:
> > +static int serial8250_cpufreq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > +                                        unsigned long val, void *data)
> > +{
> > +   struct uart_8250_port *p;
> > +   struct uart_port *uport;
> > +
> > +   p = container_of(nb, struct uart_8250_port, freq_transition);
> > +   uport = &p->port;
> > +
> > +   if (IS_ERR(p->clk))
> > +           goto cpu_freq_exit;
> > +
> > +   if (p->port.uartclk == clk_get_rate(p->clk))
> > +           goto cpu_freq_exit;
> > +
> > +   p->port.uartclk = clk_get_rate(p->clk);
> > +   if (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) {
> > +           struct ktermios *termios;
> > +           struct tty_struct *tty;
> > +           if (uport->state == NULL)
> > +                   goto cpu_freq_exit;
> > +
> > +           tty = uport->state->port.tty;
> 
> Need locking on port->tty.
> 
> > +           if (tty == NULL)
> > +                   goto cpu_freq_exit;
> > +
> 
> Need locking on tty->termios
> 
> I'd say this is also probably at the wrong level - why not do it at the
> uart_port level instead (ie move the code you have into serial_core using
> uart_port) - you've made it all nicely generic already.
> 
> Alan
>       
        
Thank you for the review comments.
I will submit an updated version of patch soon.

Regards, 
Chaithrika


_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to