Hi Kevin, [...] > I know Sergei isn't used to me agreeing with him ;) but I tend to > agree with him on the increased bulk of gpio_set_value(). > > It's not simply the increased size that is an issue here. The point > of these inlines (as the comment suggests) is for low-overhead > bit-banging. With the introduction of different methods depending on > GPIO type, as well as the locking for the tnetv style, this is no > longer low-overhead in my mind. > > Below is an alternate solution.
Agreed on the solution. This is (somewhat) similar to an earlier tnetv107x series, in which the inline gpio code wouldn't kick in on the tnetv107x controller. Looks like we've gone full circle on this. I will post an updated series. Thanks. Regards Cyril. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
