Hirosh Dabui wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 07:14 AM, Jon Povey wrote:
>> [email protected] wrote:

>>
>>> The bug implied the use of macros to access the relevant hardware
>>> register e.g. the driver code used the macro like this:
>>> 'gpio_reg_clear_bit(&reg->data_out, gpio)'
>>>
>>> But it has to be used like this:
>>> 'gpio_reg_clear_bit(reg->data_out, gpio)'.
>>>
>> Could the macro be made into an inline function so it can do
>> type-checking to avoid/catch this in future?
>
> Hello Jon,
>
> if you do inline from it, it will not crash, the behaviour is the
> same. Also i have not seen a compiler warning..

The point is, if you make it an inline function instead of a macro,
the compiler can check that you pass the appropriate type instead of
a pointer to it.

So it would give compiler warnings if you pass the wrong thing, where
at the moment it silently allows a bug.

--
Jon Povey
[email protected]

Racelogic is a limited company registered in England. Registered number 2743719 
.
Registered Office Unit 10, Swan Business Centre, Osier Way, Buckingham, Bucks, 
MK18 1TB .

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by 
Racelogic Ltd for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is 
directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from 
your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the 
error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be corrected. The 
views expressed by the sender of this communication do not necessarily 
represent those of Racelogic Ltd. Please note that Racelogic reserves the right 
to monitor e-mail communications passing through its network


_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to