On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:05:07PM +0530, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 18:09:17, Mark Brown wrote:
> > ...unfortunately conflicts with this - currently all clock API > > implementations are unique to the platform and there's no way of adding > > clocks that works over multiple platforms. > Hmm, I guess I have a limited view of this. We do have drivers which > use clock API and work across OMAP and DaVinci series of ARM SoCs. > The clock implementation in this case is under mach-omap and mach-davinci > respectively. It's mostly fine from the point of view of using clocks, it's if you're trying to provide a clock that there's no API you can rely on - the clock API itself only includes the user side and every platform gets to provide its own implementation. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
