On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:36:01, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 24-11-2011 16:22, Nori, Sekhar escreveu: > > Hi Mauro, > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 23:35:24, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Em 12-11-2011 13:06, Manjunath Hadli escreveu: > >>> move vpif related code for capture and display drivers > >>> from dm646x platform header file to vpif_types.h as these definitions > >>> are related to driver code more than the platform or board. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <[email protected]> > >> > >> Manju, > >> > >> Why are you re-sending a patch? > >> > >> My understanding is that you're maintaining the davinci patches, so it is > >> up to you to put those patches on your tree and send me a pull request when > >> they're done. So, please, don't pollute the ML re-sending emails that > >> are for yourself to handle. > > > > Since this particular patch touches arch/arm/mach-davinci > > as well as drivers/media/video, the plan was to queue the > > patch through ARM tree with your Ack. We did not get your > > ack the last time around[1] so it was resent. > > > > Do let me know if your ack is not needed. > > > > Thanks, > > Sekhar > > > > [1] > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21840.html > > Hmm.. I missed this email, but just re-sending it without request my ACK > doesn't help > much ;) > > If this ever happens again, next time the better is to forward me the patch > again, on > an email asking for my ack. > > With regards to the patch: > > Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Thanks Mauro. Queuing this for v3.3 submission. Manju, while committing I changed the subject line to: "ARM: davinci: vpif: move code to driver core header from platform" to better match the current subject line conventions. Regards, Sekhar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
