On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 16:30:07, Bas van den Berg wrote: > The name and parent of pll1_sysclk6 should be pll1 and not pll0. > Checked and tested in debugfs on OmapL138. > > Signed-off-by: Bas van den Berg <[email protected]> > ---
Thanks for spotting this. Looking at the technical reference manual[1], there is a bigger issue here. PLL1 SYSCLK6 doesn't exist in hardware! Only PLL1_SYSCLK[1-3] are valid. The right fix would be simply to remove these erroneous entries. Would be able to respin the patch? Thanks, Sekhar [1] http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruh77a/spruh77a.pdf _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
