Hi Arnd, On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 20:29:52, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2012, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > > > Can you please pull these DaVinci clean-up patches for > > the v3.4 merge window? I have made sure that these don't > > have any conflicts with the rmk/for-armsoc branch of > > the arm-soc tree. > > > > These patches need the following two commits from linux-next > > (next-20120224) to keep the VPIF and CQ93VC drivers building. > > > > 2e932f2 ASoC: CQ93VC: remove machine specific header file inclusion from > > codec > > db38951 [media] davinci: vpif: remove machine specific header file includes > > In general, don't worry too much about conflicts that are easy to > resolve. However, having these extra dependencies is not good, > because it means that we cannot easily build-test the arm-soc > tree by itself and it breaks bisection through the git history. > > In the future, please make sure that dependent commits show up > in the right order. For now, I've added the patch below on top > of your series.
I guess the cleanest way to do that would have been to let these patches go through my tree with appropriate maintainer acks (but that obviously didn't happen - will try and fix that for future). Per my understanding, it is encouraged that a patch should get applied only through one tree, so I was reluctant to apply them to any of the branches I send to you after they were already in linux-next through other trees. Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
