On 4/16/2013 10:18 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:42:31AM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 4/16/2013 1:48 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:53:18PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>> Hi Arnd, Olof, >>>> >>>> Can you please the following SoC updates for DaVinci. >>>> The branch depends on (and merges) an immutable branch >>>> from Ohad adding DA8XX rempote proc driver. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Where is this branch from? Git URL and branch name, please -- we prefer to >>> pull >>> these in as separate branches under depends/* as well to document it. >> >> Here is the repo and branch: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ohad/remoteproc.git for-next > > Oh! Looking at that branch, and the new branch from you, I don't actually see > a dependency between them. Sure, the Davinci mach-side code registers a new > device, but until the driver has the corresponding changes, there's no > breakage > caused by the new registration. There are no new data structures introduced > either, so there's no build-time dependency added.
That's right! I can swear there was some platform data that the driver needed at some stage which caused the dependency. Whatever that was, its gone now (and I failed to notice it) so there is no real need of merging the remoteproc branch. > So it would be just as easy to just merge this as a nondependent branch. When > both sides of the change land, remoteproc will work. But until then, nothing > existing will be broken. > > Sound ok? If so, please just rebase your 4 patches on top of the old SoC > branch > without the dependency and send a fresh pull request, please. :) Okay, I will rebase and send updated pull request. I will have to update the board support pull request too. Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
