Hi Mark, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:29:20PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > On the DMA library movement, I was been waiting for acks > > from Russell and Mark, but did not get them. OTOH, there > > have been no objections as well. I assume the movement > > is not a problem since its a movement within arch/arm > > and does not end-up bringing new code in. > I'm not sure I've actually seen this code? Is this the result of these > endless threads about MMC that I keep on getting spammed with - if it is > I did ask you guys to let me know when you'd actually figured out what > you were doing. Given that there's subsystem work on DMA within ASoC > recently I'd really rather this got reviewed. The 2 patches that Sekhar posted are simple movement of API not related to the problems with ASoC. The davinci-pcm driver uses the EDMA code being moved. In the long run the davinci-pcm driver will have to be migrated to use DMA Engine but that is a separate topic. Thanks, Joel -- View this message in context: http://davinci-linux-open-source.1494791.n2.nabble.com/GIT-PULL-1-2-DaVinci-SoC-updates-for-v3-11-tp7583284p7583307.html Sent from the davinci-linux-open-source mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
