On 2009-11-26, Lino Sanfilippo <lino.sanfili...@avira.com> wrote: > And what about the solution I suggested to avoid the whole recursion > thing (by simply passing _lower_ dentry and mount to > dazukofs_open()). Do you (or someone else) see any problems with > that?
I don't like the idea of userspace getting a handle directly to the lower mount. All activity of the registered process would go unnoticed by DazukoFS. This may even cause problems because the atime's could become out of sync. I'm not certain how safe it is for any processes to be playing with files underneath DazukoFS while DazukoFS is mounted. John Ogness -- Dazuko Maintainer _______________________________________________ Dazuko-devel mailing list Dazuko-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-devel
