On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:24, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I've found the qmark style to be sufficient for everything

I agree. Considering that many modules already support qmark, and those
that currently use 'format'/'pyformat' would have to move to something
else if these are dropped, I'd like to suggest that supporting 'qmark'
style should become a required feature. Modules would be free to also
implement 'named' and/or 'numeric', but supporting 'qmark' should be
mandatory.

-Carsten


_______________________________________________
DB-SIG maillist  -  DB-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig

Reply via email to