On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 08:24, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > I've found the qmark style to be sufficient for everything
I agree. Considering that many modules already support qmark, and those that currently use 'format'/'pyformat' would have to move to something else if these are dropped, I'd like to suggest that supporting 'qmark' style should become a required feature. Modules would be free to also implement 'named' and/or 'numeric', but supporting 'qmark' should be mandatory. -Carsten _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig