> Martin Blais wrote: >> I want to propose a few improvements on the DBAPI 2.0 Cursor.execute() >> method interface. You can find the details of my proposed changes >> here: >> http://furius.ca/pubcode/pub/conf/common/lib/python/dbapiext.html >> >> And a pure-Python preliminary implementation of these changes that can >> sit on an existing DBAPI 2.0 implementation (tested with psycopg2): >> http://furius.ca/pubcode/pub/conf/common/lib/python/dbapiext.py >> >> (If this gets accepted IMO this preliminary hack should instead be >> implemented at the lower-level of the specific DBAPI implementations >> for performance reasons...)
If it can be implemented as a wrapper it doesn't seem too important to me. It also doesn't seem very performance-sensitive. I would like to see some improvements in DB-API, but these are in the area of better metadata about connections and normalizing some of the stickier areas (like paramstyle), and maybe some more normalization of connection instantiation. I think the norm should be that DB-API connections get wrapped if you are concerned about convenience. All that said, I think there's also room for more standards, but they can build on the DB-API instead of extending it. -- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
