On 2006-1003 14:39:35, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > Il giorno mar, 03/10/2006 alle 13.17 +0200, Mario Frasca ha scritto: > > I can't remember if type adaptation and type-caster registration are > > a prerogative of psycopg2 or are in general available on all db-api2 > > modules. > > They are a prerogative of psycopg but other drivers offer similar > methods.
is this the right place, I mean this db-sig, to propose that something like this be included in the next version of db-api? also: my initial posting was about trying to get something like... > > > This feature is used by the GeoTypes module that adds support > > > for all geometrical types to psycopg. See: > > > http://initd.org/tracker/psycopg/wiki/GeoTypes ... something like <GeoTypes or whatever else performing good enough> into Python, so that we could have a reference class hierarchy for OpenGIS objects, something that a db-api compliant module can rely on, rather than something that can use a db-api compliant module. the situation at the moment is that we have no reference class hierarchy for OpenGIS objects *and* that db-api compliant modules do not offer a standardized way to transform OpenGIS data from python to db and back. reading with interest the reactions from the group. MF -- Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night. _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
