Art Protin wrote at 2007-5-22 09:22 -0400: > ... >In my opinion (which is never as humble as it should be), "qmark" is >barely adequate; >numeric should be the required minimum. But now that so many have >gotten used >to "qmark", it will probably never go away.
If we speak about readability and safety, "%(name)s" combined with a dictionary is far better than "numeric" or "qmark". SQL statements can get quite a lot of parameters and readability is therefore valuable... -- Dieter _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
