Carl Karsten wrote at 2007-6-24 12:20 -0500: >I'm still trying to come up with a set of possible meanings for backwards >compatibility, something like > >doesn't break: > >any existing code >any conceivable code >reasonable code >code that conforms to any documentation found, including module code. >code that conforms to the docs bundled with the module
+1 >code that conforms to the docs found under python.org +1 >code that conforms to pep 249 +1 -- Dieter _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
