Il giorno mar, 22/01/2008 alle 15.48 +0700, Stuart Bishop ha scritto: > > I'm happy with the design. > I am very happy too, but.. > > I would think the following would be better names: > con.begin_prepared(xid=None) > con.prepare_transaction() > con.rollback_prepared(xid=None) > con.commit_prepared(xid=None) > con.list_prepared()
I don't like "prepared" because can be interpreted as "prepared transaction" as as "prepared statement". I'd like something that won't confuse users. I agree that xa is too specific. That leaves us with the long prepared_transaction or something generic like twophase (or 2pc or tpc_prefix, or?) begin_prepared_transaction() prepare_transaction() rollback_prepared_transaction() ... begin_2pc_transaction() prepare_2pc_transaction() rollback_2pc_transaction() ... begin_twophase() prepare_twophase() rollback_twophase() ... tpc_begin() tpc_prepare() tpc_rollback() federico -- Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] INIT.D Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] All programmers are optimists. -- Frederick P. Brooks, Jr.
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
