On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:12 -0500, Bob Kline wrote: > I've been search for information which would provide some background > information on why there are so many choices for talking to PostgreSQL > with Python, as well as guidance as to which of the options is the most > widely used, most stable, most likely to be maintained in the future, > has the fewest bugs, provides fullest feature support, etc. Are the > deficiencies in each of the drivers so serious that so many programmers > are driven to roll their own? Or are these the outgrowths of ambitious > student projects? If anyone knows of such a guide (preferably not too > horribly out of date), I'd be very grateful for a link. Lacking the > existing of such a document, perhaps those of you who have been done > serious work with the drivers would be willing to share what they have > learned about the relative merits of what's out there.
I can tell you that the only driver CMD uses is psycopg2. As far as I know all the drivers are DB-API compliant. Joshua D. Drake > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir. _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
