On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote: > On 05.11.2012 18:29, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote: >>> On 05.11.2012 10:46, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:28 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote: >>>>> On 04.11.2012 23:24, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Is everybody happy with that? >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good :-) >>>> >>>> While at changing the DBAPI: would it be ok to reformat it in reST? >>>> Not only for aesthetic reasons, but also to provide anchors to refer >>>> to: in psycopg docs there are several cross references to the api and >>>> they can only be to the whole file, not to the point being referenced. >>>> I can do it if you want. >>> >>> If you'd like to do the conversion, we can go ahead with this. I'd >>> suggest you first do the conversion and then we add the new text >>> snippet for context managers. >> >> Here is a mockup of the pep rendered with stylesheets in place: >> <http://piro.synology.me/dbapi/>. Please review it: if it's fine we >> can submit it for inclusion in the peps repos. Current version of the >> pep in reST is at <http://piro.synology.me/dbapi/pep-0249.txt>. > > Thanks, Daniele. I'll have a look later today. Which version of > the file is more current ? The one on your site or the one on > the ticket ? > > http://bugs.python.org/issue16420
They should be equal, haven't changed anything after submitting it to the tracker. I'll keep the tracker informed if I change anything else. I've seen you have just dropped the note [9] (http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/888c87639210): I'll leave you to do the same on the reST version. -- Daniele _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig