On May 2, 2013, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote: > > I like the idea with a property. I'm not sure about those other name > candidates, though: "connection.database" make the code very > readable, IMO. > > Is there a possible name clash with existing attributes on database > modules that we would need to take into account ? > > Another readable candidate would be "connection.dbapi".
+1 for connection.dbapi > > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > eGenix.com > > Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, May 02 2013) >>>> Python Projects, Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>>> mxODBC.Zope/Plone.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ > ________________________________________________________________________ > 2013-04-30: Released eGenix PyRun 1.2.0 ... http://egenix.com/go44 > > ::::: Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::::: > > eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 > D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg > Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 > http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ _______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
