OK that's two "sure, let's absolve ourselves of this problem" responses :)
any opinion on executemany() being less useful if this requirement is not established, and/or encouraging DBAPI authors to at least *document* this themselves and maybe *prefer* maintaining ordering ? On Fri, Apr 7, 2023, at 1:54 PM, Erlend Egeberg Aasland wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 at 19:15, Mike Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> wrote: >> >> […] The scope here is, should pep-249 add some verbiage: "the order in which >> parameters are processed by executemany() should not be assumed to be in the >> order the parameters were given". […] > > Sounds good to me. > > Erlend >>
_______________________________________________ DB-SIG maillist - DB-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/db-sig
