Hi all,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:45:18PM +0200, denis wrote:
> Why are you only considering long term, complex solutions that seem to
> have no agreement?
Please strive to be excellent, the above sentence is neither
constructive nor true.
> There is a simple and quick option. Let me say it again in a few
> lines.
>
> - Suppose we drop the requirement for ASN auth on ROUTE creation.
This very option was presented as one of the possibilities during the
BoF session, labeled "Direction C":
https://ripe70.ripe.net/presentations/70-cross-registry-bof_ripe70.pdf
> If you don't want to drop the ASN auth option simply extend the
> notification/acceptance process to the ASN resource holder for non
> RIPE ASNs. We still don't need copies in the RIPE Database.
Interesting ideas. Let us discuss this idea in a new mail thread.
Kind regards,
Job
