Hi, On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 02:12:54PM +0100, Sascha Luck [ml] via db-wg wrote: > There is nothing stupid or unreasonable about asking to delay an > action that *will* cause operational issues even if their root > cause lies elsewhere.
Since no existing objects will be removed, it will not break anything
relying on these objects today.
New objects cannot be created anymore, right. Which is the whole point.
Job has pointed out alternatives if people feel they must create an
unauthorized route: object somewhere. And this really is something
that people need to discuss with their upstream providers how *those*
do filtering, and what needs to be registered where.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
