Dear WG,

I'd like to raise the issue of bogon prefixes in the RIPE IRR, and ask
RIPE NCC to remove all "bogon" route object registrations from the
"RIPE-NONAUTH" IRR database.

Today I was made aware of this example:

        $ whois -h whois.ripe.net -- "-Troute6 2001:db8::/32" | egrep -v "%|^$"
        route6:         2001:db8::/32
        origin:         AS25375
        descr:          AS25375
        mnt-by:         ch-stafag-1-mnt
        mnt-by:         LEUNET-SECURITY-MNT
        created:        2018-08-25T15:27:50Z
        last-modified:  2018-08-25T15:27:50Z
        source:         RIPE

I'd consider the following prefixes, and any more-specifics of these to
be bogons prefixes:

    0.0.0.0/8       # RFC 1122 'this' network
    10.0.0.0/8      # RFC 1918 private space
    100.64.0.0/10   # RFC 6598 Carrier grade nat space
    127.0.0.0/8     # RFC 1122 localhost
    169.254.0.0/16  # RFC 3927 link local
    172.16.0.0/12   # RFC 1918 private space 
    192.0.2.0/24    # RFC 5737 TEST-NET-1
    192.168.0.0/16  # RFC 1918 private space
    198.18.0.0/15   # RFC 2544 benchmarking
    198.51.100.0/24 # RFC 5737 TEST-NET-2
    203.0.113.0/24  # RFC 5737 TEST-NET-3
    224.0.0.0/4     # Multicast
    240.0.0.0/4     # Reserved
    ::/8            # RFC 4291 IPv4-compatible, loopback, et al 
    0100::/64       # RFC 6666 Discard-Only
    2001:2::/48     # RFC 5180 BMWG
    2001:10::/28    # RFC 4843 ORCHID
    2001:db8::/32   # RFC 3849 documentation
    3ffe::/16       # RFC 3701 old 6bone
    fc00::/7        # RFC 4193 unique local unicast
    fe80::/10       # RFC 4291 link local unicast
    fec0::/10       # RFC 3879 old site local unicast
    ff00::/8        # RFC 4291 multicast

Any route/route6 objects covered by the above prefixes should be deleted
from the database, and the software should be extended in such a way
that nobody can register new route/route6 objects covered by the above
list.

Kind regards,

Job

Reply via email to