Hello, I am currently out of the office until Monday 01-July and do not have access to my email.
For urgent questions or requests, please send an email to <[email protected]> On 26 Jun 2019, at 1:23 AM, Ian Dickinson via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > Because --list-versions & --show-version require a single object (which also > happens to be a primary key) rather than a list. > I'm certainly not sure what the output of --list-versions should look like > against multiple objects, and --show-version makes no sense against multiple > objects IMHO. > > If you want to achieve this, you need to handle this in your own > script/wrapper. > I don't think this makes sense for the db to do for you. > > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: db-wg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette via > db-wg > Sent: 25 June 2019 23:21 > To: Cynthia Revström <[email protected]> > Cc: DB-WG <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [db-wg] --list-versions > > In message > <cakw1m3nxxaflzrrtehzu5sfyincabg4vdkqpxgf_as5+vto...@mail.gmail.com>, > =?UTF-8?Q?Cynthia_Revstr=C3=B6m?= <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I would assume that is because for some reason netname is not unique, > >If you run whois -h whois.ripe.net CYNTHIA-V6-TEST -r You can see my > >point, 2 inet6num with the same netname. > > I understand that a netname can (and often does) correlate to multiple IP > address blocks. That fact, by itself, does not clarify why it would either be > difficult or impossible to provide the --list-versions and --show-version > functionality for netnames. > > > Disclaimer > This email is private and may be confidential and is intended for the > recipient only. If misdirected please notify us by telephone and return and > confirm that it has been deleted from your system and any copies destroyed. > If you are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using, > printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this email or any > information within it. We use reasonable endeavours to virus scan all emails > leaving our organisation but no warranty is given that this email and any > attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus checking. The > right to monitor email communication through our networks is reserved by us.
