On 01/07/2020 20:54, Job Snijders via db-wg wrote: > The next best thing we can now do is attempt to rename the ones that > actually clash with autnums, which luckily is only a very short list, > and prevent future occurrences with a creation filter.
As I don't think we have seen this exploited (yet) I'd settle for the latter; to prevent future occurrences. It wouldn't hurt to ask those nicely to rename their mntners, but I'd wager most of those mntners identified will be in use by the aut-num of the same AS number. A random selection from Matthias' list that I've just checked quickly are exactly like that; aut-num AS49717, mnt-by AS49717. Regards, -- Tom
