So the general scheme is SOURCE-NAME-FUNCTION, i.e. RIPE-NCC-MNT ? Von: db-wg <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von William Sylvester via db-wg Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. September 2020 21:44 An: [email protected] Betreff: [db-wg] MNTNER Naming : Consensus
db-wg members, The chairs of the database working group believe there is a consensus to have a standardised name format for creating new MNTNER objects. There was talk of a prefix (MNT-) or a suffix (-MNT). When creating a new standard it doesn't really make sense to introduce a standard with multiple formats. As there are currently 36347 MNTNERs that end with -MNT and 12480 MNTNERs that start with MNT-, we suggest that the standard should be to end with -MNT. We ask the RIPE NCC to take the next steps in moving this request forward, conducting an impact analysis, and proceed with implementation. Best regards. William & denis db-wg chairs
