I would like to see more here on the mailing list, so I would request that any future calls be recorded and published.
I have opinions on this subject and I don't think me missing the call should leave me out of the loop. - Cynthia On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 11:31 Stavros Konstantaras < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Cynthia, > > Yes the call happened and the problem description is almost ready. Soon > will be published here in the mailing list so the DB-WG chairs can > officially create a new NWI and submit it to RIPE NCC developers > > Thank you for your support and your interest on that :) > > > Best regards, > > Stavros Konstantaras | Sr. Network Engineer | AMS-IX > M +31 (0) 620 89 51 04 | T +31 20 305 8999 > ams-ix.net > > On 6 Nov 2020, at 02:51, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I also support creating a new NWI for a modernized NRTM like service. > > - Cynthia > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, 02:50 Cynthia Revström, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Job, >> >> Was there a call about this yet? >> >> And if so, was there any outcome? >> >> - Cynthia >> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 20:38 Job Snijders via db-wg, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:30:28PM +0100, denis walker wrote: >>> > I would suggest we create NWI-12 to move forward with a new version of >>> > NRTM. Perhaps you could write the first draft of the problem >>> > statement? >>> >>> Given that more people than just myself were engaged with this subject >>> so far... maybe Stavros, Emil, a DB-WG chair, myself and any other >>> interested parties can have a 1 hour group phone call to formulate an >>> updated problem statement for NWI-12? >>> >>> Perhaps next week, November 4th, 15:00 UTC? Consider it a "hallway >>> chat", not something formal. The chairs can report back to the mailing >>> list. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Job >>> >>> >
