In message <[email protected]>, Hank Nussbacher <[email protected]> wrote:
>Thanks Ronald, but that doesn't answer my question. I was hoping to see >route objects which reference *reserved* ASNs - not route objects for >unallocated ASNs. Hank, I'm frankly not sure what the value of such a sub-list would be. A bogon ASN is a bogon ASN, no? Do dues-paying members want to be underwriting the use of bogon ASNs by members whose ASN registrations have lapased due to non-payment of relevant annual fees? Regards, rfg
