I just want to add a +1 for what Nick is saying here. Also, it was terminated according to IANA over 6 years ago, so it is not really a recent depreciation.
-Cynthia On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 5:54 PM Nick Hilliard via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > Gert Doering via db-wg wrote on 23/07/2021 14:54: > > While Anycast 6to4 needs to die, it isn't fully dead yet. So routes for > > these two prefixes are legitimate. > > the discussion is whether it's appropriate for the RIPE NCC to continue > to publish route objects for this prefix, which is a different > discussion to the announcements in the dfz. > > The route objects are documentation of policy. If the prefix isn't > legitimate according to IANA or RIR allocations / assignments (and in > this case, it definitely isn't), then the route object shouldn't be in > the IRRDB. > > There's nothing stopping operators from continuing to announce the > prefix. It would be better if it were left to die, but this is > ultimately a choice of each individual operator. > > The same argument applies to the route objects for 2002::/16. > > Nick > >
