I think the best option here would simply be to ask IANA (possibly through the NRO) how these prefixes should be handled as I don't think we are necessarily the correct people to answer these questions.
-Cynthia On Fri, Oct 8, 2021, 12:01 Gert Doering via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 04:21:41PM +0300, Aleksi Suhonen via db-wg wrote: > > People keep repeating that 6to4 and Teredo are deprecated technologies, > > but they've obviously not read the deprecation RFCs themselves. The RFCs > > clearly state that while new implementations and installations of these > > tunneling methods are strongly discouraged, existing installations > > should be allowed to function for the near future for backward > > compatibility. So on these grounds I oppose removing those route objects > > too. > > Now, how long is "near future"? > > > Yes, I run one instance of these services at AS29432, and would be > > affected by this change. > > How much traffic to you see? > > We run a local 6to4 relay - not announced to "the Internet" - and I hardly > see any traffic anymore. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
