On 2024 Jan 17 (Wed) at 17:08:38 +0100 (+0100), Cynthia Revström via db-wg
wrote:
:Hi,
:
:In the DB-WG interim session I mentioned that there's currently a
:discrepancy between person objects and role objects with regards to
:contact information.
:More specifically, person objects currently require a phone number
:while role objects require an email address.
:
:I think we should try to bring person objects more in line with role
:objects by removing the phone number requirement. Ideally I would want
:it to be mandatory to have either a phone number or an email address
:in order to not lose any flexibility but I'm not sure if that is
:possible.
:
:During the session I asked if anyone was opposed to the idea and no
:one said they were so I would assume that this is relatively
:uncontroversial but please let me know what you think.
:
:-Cynthia
Fully agreed.
And while we are at it, address attributes should be made optional for
person and role objects.
--
Nasrudin walked into a teahouse and declaimed, "The moon is more useful
than the sun."
"Why?", he was asked.
"Because at night we need the light more."
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
