On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 17:03, denis walker via db-wg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Gert
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 16:05, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 03:55:26PM +0100, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
> > > This new anti-spam measure is a convenient point to reflect on how one
> > > part of the RIPE Database is used. Notifications are just one part of
> > > an audit system. Many other parts are missing. To be sending out 30k
> > > emails a day to hundreds of thousands of email addresses stored in a
> > > public database as part of an incomplete audit system has to stop.
> > > Notification emails on this scale are a relic of the past.
> >
> > Just as a counterpoint, I do like my notification e-mails.  Push
> > notification in case I do need to care, and *only then*.
> >
> > And I totally dislike having to actually look into some sort of
> > portal / web UI "is there anything I should be aware of?", because
> > this sort of polling is eating brain cycles for no good.
>
> But looking through lots of email notifications about changes that you
> already know about, because you did them, and maybe in the middle is a
> notification of an attempted security breach that failed on
> authentication (that you may miss), doesn't that also eat up brain
> cycles?
>
> So how about a compromise. A full audit trail of all details of all
> changes to all your data available by default  to designated people
> through your portal account. Plus a daily email summarising all the
> changes also sent to people whose email addresses are set up in the
> portal account. So still no notif email addresses needed all across
> the database. This could even be done per maintainer.
>

and of course this would be optional to reduce emails sent.


>
> cheers
> denis
> co-chair DB-WG
>
> ========================================================
> DISCLAIMER
> Everything I said above is my personal, professional opinion. It is
> what I believe to be honest and true to the best of my knowledge. No
> one in this industry pays me anything. I have nothing to gain or lose
> by any decision. I push for what I believe is for the good of the
> Internet, in some small way. Nothing I say is ever intended to be
> offensive or a personal attack. Even if I strongly disagree with you
> or question your motives. Politicians question each other's motives
> all the time. RIPE discussion is often as much about politics and self
> interest as it is technical. I have a style of writing that some may
> not be familiar with, others sometimes use it against me. I also have
> OCD. It makes me see the world slightly differently to others. It
> drives my mind's obsessive need for detail. I can not change the way I
> express my detailed opinions. People may choose how to interpret them.
> ========================================================
>
>
> >
> > (Having a good audit trail is fine, in case I know I'm looking for
> > something - but I do just want to see "something under my administration
> > has changed", in case I do not yet know I should be looking)
> >
> > Gert Doering
> >         -- NetMaster
> > --
> > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
> >
> > SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael
> Emmer,
> >                                            Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler
> > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> > D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change
> your subscription options, please visit:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
>
-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg

Reply via email to