> On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 01:53:42PM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote: > If there are good operational reasons for being more restrictive than > is allowed for in RFC 5341 then we should not disregard those reasons > for the sake of strict compliance with a very generous standard.
And are there any good operational reasons? As long as I strongly don't appreciate Dan's style of communication, I tend to agree with the merit here. Call me biased, but I've already met too much of "your email is too long", "too short", "contains too many dots", "contains plus sign" meaning "give us email we like or go away". RFCs are not a law, but they're here for a reason. -- Pavel (ph)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/db-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
