To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52703


User fs changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|RESOLVED                  |REOPENED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Keywords|                          |usability
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Resolution|WONTFIX                   |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Summary|table design: Don't show t|table design: Find a bette
                        |he "Auto-increment stateme|r (more usable) UI for spe
                        |nt" field unless really ne|cifiying the initial/incre
                        |cessary                   |ment value of an auto-incr
                        |                          |ement field
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 19:40:03 +0000 
2007 -------
Re-opening. The original problem - the fact that the current UI is mere
techno-babble for the unexperienced user - remains. If we want to support users
in creating auto-increments with another initial/step value (do we really? This
is way too advanced for most of them), then we should find an UI which deserves
the word "usable".

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to