On Jan 27, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> Erm, I thought all the utf-8 stuff was committed a few weeks ago. What's >> this? > > Nope. That was only part of it. We still need to handle SQL_ASCII > databases smoothly, change the client_encoding when needed, and > allow for pg_enable_utf8 to work smoothly. Plus lots of tests > and documentation (hi David C!). The other David also suggested we > think hard about a major version bump.
Ah, okay, good. I agree with the major version bump. Does it need updated docs, as well? And does this break compatibility at all for those who have used pg_enable_utf8 in the past? Best, David
