Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> > * supports case-folding in ORDER BY
>
> Not by default I hope!
No, it's not the default. The default behaviour in all things is the
current behaviour of Jochen's module. Where things like this are
introduced they are done in a way that a subclasser can choose whether
or not to even allow users access to them. If some are so evil they
shouldn't even be options, let me know :-).
> I'd strongly urge you to keep both default syntax and default behaviour
> as close to the SQL92/ODBC standards as possible.
That's my intention. I can use help from everyone in keeping me to
that.
> > Many more new features, including support for joins, aggregate functions
> > (COUNT,MAX,etc), string and numeric functions (TRIM,SUBSTR,etc) will be
> > added in the coming months. Eventually data type support will be added.
>
> As above, for all things follow the standards (like ODBC function
> names) far as possible.
Yes.
--
Jeff