Tim Bunce wrote: > Yes, yes. I agree and I plan to add something along these lines very soon. > > (From your previous message you seemed to want to add *class* attributes > and that's what would need a strong case as it doesn't fit with the DBI's > approach to life.)
I guess that's because I'm a little confused/ignorant of how attributes are implemented in DBI.pm and the DBD's. This is something I've been after for some time. If you show how to implement the new attributes I will write a patch and accompanying documentation. -- Simon Oliver
