Jon Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would anyone actually consider using a different name than DBD::Pg?
> It seems it would be a big pain with no benefit, and make it unclear
> which driver users should use.

I can see the possiblity of significant changes in behavior (in the
direction of correctness) that might make it quite smart to change the
driver name to emphasize that this really requires that you look at
your code again---and allowing those who don't have that luxury to
continue to use the old module for old code, while using the new
module for new code.

So, yeah, I think it would be rather smart if the changes end up being
as sweeping as it seems they might.

Mike.

Reply via email to