On 1/21/03 11:04 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 1/21/03 10:52 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>> Does this cover DBD's (like mine) that don't support *any* data types?
> 
> Sure.  If you really make no distinctions about data types, then you'd
> probably just make the methods no-op pass-throughs for the data.

...or you could just take the default implementations provided in DBI itself
(as some DBDs do with quote())

-John

Reply via email to