On 1/21/03 11:04 AM, John Siracusa wrote: > On 1/21/03 10:52 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote: >> Does this cover DBD's (like mine) that don't support *any* data types? > > Sure. If you really make no distinctions about data types, then you'd > probably just make the methods no-op pass-throughs for the data.
...or you could just take the default implementations provided in DBI itself (as some DBDs do with quote()) -John
