On Mon 16 Jun 2003 16:45, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is one of the "big issues" the DBI needs to address soon.

:)

> As I'm short on time right now I'm going to just throw open this

Me too.

> topic and let you all chip in with ideas...
> 
> I'll try to pick up the pieces later and then, after reviewing here,
> post a summary of proposals to dbi-users.
> 
> So, what say you all?

I'm already working with full UTF-8 support :)
But that's because we don't store the data as utf-8 in the database, because
not all versions of the databases we use support it as such. When the
application knows what data to expect (I've also tried storing the utf-8 as
binary data, or simply as 8bit character data strings, which also worked, but
made all native applications barf) you can always work around it.

I fully agree with the subcategories Dominic mentions, and I surely hope that
whatever UTF-8 support is added won't break previous workarounds or slow down
DBI in general.

> Tim.

-- 
H.Merijn Brand        Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0 & 633 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
     WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.024 &/| DBD-Unify
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/authors/id/H/HM/HMBRAND/


Reply via email to