Henrik Tougaard wrote: > Better support for transactions. At some point > I predict that the RDBMS vendors will come up > with transaction handles, and we need somewhere > to hold them - I foresee several concurrent > transactions on the same database handle.
Not to mention nested transactions (or there emulation
via savepoints). The $dbh->{InTransaction} attribute
<http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/dbi/2004-01/msg00227.html>
could indicate the nesting level in this case.
Steffen
