Dean Arnold wrote:
Where is cpan.forum located ? I can't find any links at cpan.org...
http://www.cpanforum.com/
I think the differentiator is the "Wiki"-ized content, which tends to be more structured, and would hopefully become a Wikipedia for the DBI (and DBD's and DBIx's). PerlMonks content tends to be scattered; archives of this maillist are difficult to search, and pretty unstructured (Googled or otherwise); rt.cpan is for bug reports, and
All good points. That's what I meant when I said we need to differentiate the use of a Wiki from other alternatives.
BTW: should dbi-users be included in this discussion ?
I would think so and eventually also PerlMonks and clpm, but I see an advantage to discussing it here first because if this is done wrong it will increase the work on us authors rather than decreasing it so the question of its general usefulness is a separate question from its usefulness to us as DBI-related module authors.
-- Jeff
