On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:46:52 +0200, Steffen Goeldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > In case of my use for foreign_key_info (), the set will only be big in > > case all arguments are undef, > > FYI, ODBC doesn't allow this: > > HY009 Invalid use of null pointer. > The arguments PKTableName and FKTableName were both null pointers. > > > <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/odbc/htm/odbcsqlforeignkeys.asp?frame=no> > > The DBI spec doesn't state explicitly such arbitrary restrictions: > > <http://search.cpan.org/~timb/DBI/DBI.pm#foreign_key_info> > > Thus, my implementations also allow the selection of all foreign keys. So does mine. Just uploaded to CPAN this morning > > BTW Nice link about that Dutch database: http://monetdb.cwi.nl/ > > Looks quite promising. How does it's performance and functionality > > compare to Progresql? > > For functionality, see e.g.: > > <http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Home/Features/> > <http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Development/Roadmap/> > > Usually, these guys don't speak much about missing features, they implement > it ;-) What's more interesting, IMO, is the architecture of MonetDB: > > <http://monetdb.cwi.nl/TechDocs/Core/monet/> > > I'm always cautious with performance statements. Here is a published > benchmark: > > <http://monetdb.cwi.nl/Research/Benchmarks/> > > But why do I tell you? Take the next tram and go figure it out ;-) I probably will, but my vacation starts tomorrow :) Another advantage for me is: they speak Dutch! -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using Perl 5.6.2, 5.8.0, 5.8.5, & 5.9.2 on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00 & 11.11, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, SuSE 9.2 & 9.3, and Cygwin. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn Smoking perl: http://www.test-smoke.org, perl QA: http://qa.perl.org reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
