On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:11:21AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2007 23:55:07 +0100, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 06:13:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > t/zvp_01basics............ > > > # Failed test '... should be -1263462440' > > > # at ./t/01basics.t line 234. > > > # got: -1255073832 > > > # expected: -1263462440 > > > > > > # Failed test '... should be -1263462437' > > > # at ./t/01basics.t line 235. > > > # got: -1255073829 > > > # expected: -1263462437 > > > > Interesting...
D'oh. Ignore my references to gofer subprocess. A complete Red Herring. > If this has to to with Math::BigInt, try the release from today. > Tels found some 32bit failures 1.85 is broken. 1.86 is OK again. So, David, which version of Math::BigInt are you using? According to the change notes for Math::BigInt 1.86 there should be test failures for 1.85 on 32bit systems. If you're using 1.85 did you see those and install it anyway? Tim.
