On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:11:21AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007 23:55:07 +0100, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 06:13:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > t/zvp_01basics............
> > > #   Failed test '... should be -1263462440'
> > > #   at ./t/01basics.t line 234.
> > > #          got: -1255073832
> > > #     expected: -1263462440
> > > 
> > > #   Failed test '... should be -1263462437'
> > > #   at ./t/01basics.t line 235.
> > > #          got: -1255073829
> > > #     expected: -1263462437
> > 
> > Interesting...

D'oh. Ignore my references to gofer subprocess. A complete Red Herring.

> If this has to to with Math::BigInt, try the release from today.
> Tels found some 32bit failures 1.85 is broken. 1.86 is OK again.

So, David, which version of Math::BigInt are you using?

According to the change notes for Math::BigInt 1.86 there should
be test failures for 1.85 on 32bit systems. If you're using 1.85 did you
see those and install it anyway?

Tim.

Reply via email to